<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>LabourLost &#187; Resignation</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.labourlost.org/tag/resignation/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.labourlost.org</link>
	<description>LabourLost.org 2.0</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 15 Aug 2010 11:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Labour: Even less chance of survival now</title>
		<link>http://www.labourlost.org/2009/11/labour-even-less-chance-of-survival-now/</link>
		<comments>http://www.labourlost.org/2009/11/labour-even-less-chance-of-survival-now/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 05:09:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ChiefWhip</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Leadership]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[#fail]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[#labourlost]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Election]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Europe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Labour]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Referendum]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Resignation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.labourlost.org/?p=638</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It has become clear within the past 24 hours that the chances of survival for the Parliamentary Labour Party or New Labour as they still prefer to be called (despite having thrown every last vesture of reform aside) post the General Election have become even more remote.
Whilst the row, rightly or wrongly continues apace with [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It has become clear within the past 24 hours that the chances of survival for the Parliamentary Labour Party or New Labour as they still prefer to be called (despite having thrown every last vesture of reform aside) post the General Election have become even more remote.</p>
<p>Whilst the row, rightly or wrongly continues apace with The SUN v the Government regarding the mother of Guardsman Janes there are individual movements within the PLP to shore up their defences so that those individuals are best placed to capitalise from a most catastrophic defeat.</p>
<p>The latest of these machinations on display is that by one David Miliband MP. It is very clear that Mr Miliband has his sights on a powerful role whether it be in Britain or controlling Britain from Europe.</p>
<p>Forced to make a choice yesterday David Miliband has all but refused the job of foreign affairs within the newly created European structure following the ratification of the Lisbon Treaty preferring instead to show his allegiance to the PLP.</p>
<p>Senior members of the PLP have briefed David Miliband in private that they believe there is still a chance that Gordon Brown would step down before the General Election and that he would be best placed to step into the void.</p>
<p>They have also briefed him that to walk away now would not sit well with the core support as he would appear as a rat leaving a sinking ship.</p>
<p>As a consequence this single act of forfeiture says more about his personal ambition than his desire to do what is best for his country.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.labourlost.org/2009/11/labour-even-less-chance-of-survival-now/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>January 2010; put the date in your diary!</title>
		<link>http://www.labourlost.org/2009/10/january-2010-put-the-date-in-your-diary/</link>
		<comments>http://www.labourlost.org/2009/10/january-2010-put-the-date-in-your-diary/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Oct 2009 10:35:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>TheSpeaker</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Election]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Labour]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Resignation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.labourlost.org/?p=403</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This guest post has been contributed by Julian Bray who writes on his Duckhouse blog.  Over to you Julian.
Gordon Brown to step down for &#8216;medical&#8217; reasons in January 2010? 
&#8220;Yesterday [Friday 10 October 2009] Mr Brown visited Moorfields Hospital as part of regular checks on his eye and this check was also fine. Mr Brown [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This guest post has been contributed by Julian Bray who writes on his <a href="http://julianbrayrecessionbuster07944217476.blogspot.com" target="_blank">Duckhouse blog</a>.  Over to you Julian.</p>
<p><strong>Gordon Brown to step down for &#8216;medical&#8217; reasons in January 2010? </strong></p>
<p>&#8220;Yesterday [Friday 10 October 2009] Mr Brown visited Moorfields Hospital as part of regular checks on his eye and this check was also fine. Mr Brown wants to thank the doctors and staff of the NHS, particularly Moorfields Hospital. Were there to be any change, he would of course make a further statement.&#8221;</p>
<p>10 Downing Street claimed the details had been released &#8220;in the interests of transparency&#8221;, and the hapless spokesman went on to claim &#8220;there was no question of &#8220;regular&#8221; updates on the Prime Ministers &#8216; continuing medical condition.&#8221; A really brassed-neck attempt to draw a line under current speculation. However, the approach could make it more difficult to hold back information about Mr Brown &#8217;s health and general well-being in future.</p>
<p>Contrary to media reports and claims by some commentators who should know better. I first raised questions over Gordon Browns medical condition, a few years ago when he was still at the Treasury, initially prompted by a long drawn out televised Budget Speech which for some reason, the cameras repeatedly focused on the state of Gordon Browns fingers and thumbs; all his nails were badly bitten right down to the quick, perhaps not bitten but ripped out would be more accurate.</p>
<p>Nailbiting in adults is generally accepted as a clear sign of chronic stress, not just habit. In the same Budget Speech live Telecast, Brown had sat down and the Leader of the Opposition was just rising to his feet to reply. Again a candid cutaway, showed Brown having a furtive nail nibble whilst listening to an over the shoulder comment from Tony Blair, seated alongside him.</p>
<p>The PM has been repeatedly quizzed during interviews over his medical condition and his eyesight ( &#8216;telly-land &#8216; increasingly reliant upon the bloggers for breaking news and scandal), BBC &#8217;s Andrew Marr Show last month, (the video being included in  &#8217;Duckhouse Blog &#8216;). During the MARR interview Mr Brown reluctantly denied mounting speculation that he was becoming increasingly dependent on prescription painkillers. This should be an easy matter to resolve by a simple regular Urine test or releasing Gordon Browns medical records and a comprehensive list of all OTC (Over the counter), prescription and other drugs, he and Sarah Brown may have access to.</p>
<p>Some so far unconfirmed media reports had suggested Mr Brown might use concerns about his health as a legitimate and dignified reason for stepping down as Prime Minister ahead of the election. New concerns about tears to the retina in his one remaining eye &#8211; Brown lost his other eye as the result of an injury, whist playing Rugby as a teenager.</p>
<p>Quoted on the Internet, Som Prasad, a consultant ophthalmologist at Arrow Park Hospital on Merseyside, Northern England, said that although Mr Brown may not undergo more surgery on his retina, other less drastic surgical procedures could be on the cards.</p>
<p>Tears to the retina can be heat-sealed by directing a laser beam of light through the pupil of the eye to produce a scar which seals the tear. An alternative would be cryotherapy treatment, where a freezing treatment is applied by a pen-shaped probe to the outside of the eye. But if the retina becomes detached &#8211; as has happened to Mr Brown twice before &#8211; &#8220;more complicated operations&#8221; may also be needed to prevent the loss of sight.</p>
<p>Candidly  &#8217;friends &#8216; of Gordon Brown have been sugesting January 2010 would be a very good time for Gordon Brown to withdraw from politics and retire with dignity. That the door has been left wide open he could easily cite  &#8217;medical reasons &#8216;. Fighting a long and protracted war in Afghanistan (Brown admits to not understanding the ritualistic ways of the Military), constant  &#8217;head on &#8216; rows with the Forces and now a possible formal written demand, that following the MP expenses scandal, Gordon Brown might be required to pay some of the money claimed as expenses over the last five years, back to the Treasury. Will any payment will include his subscription to Sky Sports satellite premium TV channels then?</p>
<p>Rats leaving a sinking ship? Just political tactics then? You can decide in May 2010 at the General Election</p>
<p>About Julian:  <a href="http://www.blogger.com/profile/17199331063397553707" target="_blank">Julian Bray</a> is a broadcaster, moderator, speaker, journalist and lectures on leadership, company turnarounds, corporate and recession busting strategies, politics, aviation, travel and The City.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.labourlost.org/2009/10/january-2010-put-the-date-in-your-diary/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Third time lucky?</title>
		<link>http://www.labourlost.org/2009/10/third-time-lucky/</link>
		<comments>http://www.labourlost.org/2009/10/third-time-lucky/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Oct 2009 14:03:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ChiefWhip</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Cabinet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Europe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Resignation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.labourlost.org/?p=136</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[#Labourlost the right to preach to the British public about standards and ethics after the debacle which began the day that Lord Mandelson, the Business Secretary first resigned from the Cabinet when he was still an MP.
In 1998, whilst working as Trade Secretary and in the days without his peerage Peter Mandelson resigned over the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#Labourlost the right to preach to the British public about standards and ethics after the debacle which began the day that Lord Mandelson, the Business Secretary <a title="Peter Mandelson quits" href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk_politics/241289.stm">first resigned</a> from the Cabinet when he was still an MP.</p>
<p>In 1998, whilst working as Trade Secretary and in the days without his peerage <a title="Trade Secretary is off" href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk_politics/1134868.stm">Peter Mandelson resigned</a> over the interest-free loan of £373,000 from the Paymaster General <a title="Geoffrey Robinson quits" href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk_politics/241350.stm">Geoffrey Robinson</a> who later accused Lord Mandelson of lying to the Commons about the home loan affair that cost both of them their Government jobs.</p>
<p>In his resignation letter Peter Mandelson was obviously both embarrassed and humbled</p>
<blockquote><p>I should not, with all candour, have entered into the arrangement.</p>
<p>I should, having done so, have told you and other colleagues whose advice I value and I should have told my permanent secretary on learning of the inquiry into Geoffrey Robinson, although I entirely stood aside from this.</p></blockquote>
<p>The <a title="Peter Mandelson quits, again" href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/onthisday/hi/dates/stories/january/24/newsid_4605000/4605234.stm">second resignation</a> came in 2001 over a passport row for the <a title="Passport row: Timeline" href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk_politics/1137974.stm">Hinduja</a> family amid their sponsorship of the <a title="Faith Zone article" href="http://www.independent.co.uk/news/millennium-countdown-churches-slam-the-faith-zone-just-a-gimmick-1131969.html">Faith Zone</a> in the Millennium Dome.</p>
<p>After a number of years in the wilderness Mandelson became a <a href="http://ec.europa.eu/index_en.htm">European Commissioner</a> For Trade in 2004 until 2008 when during a particularly rough time for Gordon Brown there was a shock &#8216;call-up&#8217; for Peter Mandelson who was said to be</p>
<blockquote><p>surprised but proud</p></blockquote>
<p>&#8230;to be offered the role as Business Secretary.</p>
<p>How is it all to end for Lord Mandelson third time around? Only time will tell but you can rest assured that the British public are less susceptible to his wily ways since his own fallibility was exposed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.labourlost.org/2009/10/third-time-lucky/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
